Claude
- Anthropic — reasoning & reliability
- Writing, design, code, Cowork
- Best balance of quality and security
- Ideal for everyday professional use
Claude, ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Grok, Mistral: understand the strengths of each generative AI and choose the right tools for your business, role by role.
Use case: Reports, meeting minutes, summary notes from long documents.
Result: Writing time divided by 3 to 5, instant professional quality.
Use case: Code generation, debugging, interface mock-ups, technical documentation.
Result: Development 2 to 3× faster, prototypes in hours rather than days.
Sector, desired tone, constraints: the richer the context, the better the result.
PDFs, code, transcripts: Claude works directly on your content.
"More concise", "more formal tone": it is a back-and-forth, not a single order.
Use case: Campaign ideas, article drafts, quick visuals.
Result: Faster content production, rapid creative iterations.
Use case: A custom GPT fed with the FAQ and product documentation.
Result: First-level answers automated, support team relieved.
One GPT per recurring process (standard contracts, support replies…).
Always cross-check factual data before sharing.
Use a Team/Enterprise account for data confidentiality.
Use case: Automatic Teams meeting summaries, sorting and replying to Outlook emails.
Result: Less admin time, minutes ready at the end of the meeting.
Use case: Complex formulas, trend analysis, visualisations on large tables.
Result: Analyses produced in minutes rather than hours.
The best choice if the company is already on this ecosystem.
Copilot behaves differently in Word, Excel or Teams.
Answer quality depends directly on your Office files.
Use case: Competitive monitoring, summaries of recent industry news.
Result: Up-to-date information without changing search tool.
Use case: Analysing 100+ page reports, extracting key data.
Result: A summary in minutes on very large documents.
The best choice if the company uses Gmail/Docs/Sheets every day.
Images, screenshots, videos: Gemini analyses them directly.
Prefer it when the volume of text exceeds what other tools handle well.
Use case: Quickly identify topics rising on social networks.
Result: More responsive social content, better aligned with the news.
Use case: Quickly spot brand mentions and the tone of discussions.
Result: Faster response when a sensitive topic emerges.
Use it as a support for monitoring, not as your main writing tool.
Real-time sources need extra verification.
Less relevant for writing official documents.
Use case: Processing sensitive data that requires European hosting.
Result: Using generative AI with no compromise on GDPR compliance.
Use case: Self-hosting an open-weight model on internal infrastructure.
Result: Full control over data, costs under control at scale.
Public sector, health, legal: Mistral meets specific requirements.
Relevant if your IT department wants to keep control of the infrastructure.
Combine it with Claude or ChatGPT for uses not subject to these constraints.
| AI | Vendor | Key strength | Ideal for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Claude | Anthropic | Reliability, writing, code, security | Everyday professional use |
| ChatGPT | OpenAI | Versatility, custom GPTs | Brainstorming, content |
| Copilot | Microsoft | Office 365 integration | Companies already on Microsoft |
| Gemini | Multimodal, up-to-date search | Companies on Google Workspace | |
| Grok | xAI | Real-time news and trends | Monitoring, social media |
| Mistral | Mistral AI | Sovereignty, EU hosting | Regulated sectors, strict GDPR |
Ready to equip your organisation?
Not necessarily. Many companies combine a general-purpose tool (Claude or ChatGPT) with one built into their office suite (Copilot or Gemini). The key is to avoid spreading yourself across too many tools at once.
No. They increase capacity on repetitive tasks (writing, summarising, basic code) and free up time for strategy, customer relations and creativity.
Each vendor offers enterprise plans with confidentiality commitments (data not used for training). Requirements vary by sector: Mistral and Copilot are often preferred under strict GDPR constraints. Check the contractual details with your IT team.
Most of these AIs offer a free or trial tier, then paid per-user plans (from a few euros to a few tens of euros per month). Copilot and Gemini are often included in, or add-ons to, existing licences (Microsoft 365, Google Workspace).
Getting started takes half a day per tool. Mastering advanced uses (complex prompts, automations, workflows) builds up over several weeks, through real use cases.
IIA helps companies choose, deploy and train on generative AI, whatever tool you pick. Contact us for a diagnosis suited to your organisation.